Skip to content
AI cost and planning

AI readiness assessment

Answer 17 questions across data, process, team and risk to see how ready you are for an AI project, and what to fix first.

Free, runs in your browser, no sign-up. Updated 2026-10-25.

Guidance, not an audit. The weights and bands are stated planning assumptions, not a benchmark or certification.

Data
We know where the data for this use case lives

AI work starts with finding the data. Unknown or scattered sources are the most common early delay. Weight 2.

We can access that data programmatically (API, export or database)

Data locked in screens or PDFs needs extraction work before any model can use it. Weight 2.

The data is reasonably complete and consistent

Models repeat the gaps and errors in their inputs. Weight 1.

We have examples of good outcomes (past answers, labelled cases)

Examples are needed to test whether the AI is right, and later to tune it. Weight 1.

We are allowed to use the data this way (contracts, consent)

Customer contracts and privacy law can restrict sending data to a model provider. Weight 2.

Process
The process is written down step by step

You cannot automate a process nobody can describe. Writing it down often finds the real bottleneck. Weight 2.

The task happens often enough to matter

Automation pays back through repetition; rare tasks rarely justify the build. Weight 1.

We measure the process today (time, cost, error rate)

Without a baseline you cannot show the AI helped. Weight 2.

There is a human fallback when the AI is unsure or wrong

AI output is probabilistic; a review or hand-off step keeps mistakes contained. Weight 2.

Team
One person owns the outcome

Projects without an owner stall between teams. Weight 2.

We have (or can hire) engineers to build and maintain it

Integrations, evaluations and monitoring need ongoing engineering after launch. Weight 1.

The people who do the work today are involved

They know the edge cases, and adoption fails when they are left out. Weight 1.

There is a budget for usage costs as well as the build

Model API costs scale with use. Price them early with the cost calculators. Weight 1.

Risk and governance
We know what happens if the AI gets it wrong

The cost of an error decides how much review and testing you need. Weight 2.

We have checked which rules apply (e.g. EU AI Act, HIPAA, GDPR)

Some uses are restricted or need documentation before launch. Weight 2.

Security has reviewed where data goes and who can see outputs

Prompts and outputs can leak data across users if access is not designed in. Weight 1.

We will test the AI against real cases before and after launch

Evaluations catch regressions when prompts, data or models change. Weight 1.

Result

Readiness 0%, Early.

Readiness
0%
Early. Start by choosing one process and measuring it today.
Data
0%
Process
0%
Team
0%
Risk and governance
0%

Fix these first

  1. We know where the data for this use case lives (no, weight 2)
  2. We can access that data programmatically (API, export or database) (no, weight 2)
  3. We are allowed to use the data this way (contracts, consent) (no, weight 2)
  4. The process is written down step by step (no, weight 2)
  5. We measure the process today (time, cost, error rate) (no, weight 2)
  6. There is a human fallback when the AI is unsure or wrong (no, weight 2)

17 items unanswered count as no.

Each item scores no 0, partly 1, yes 2, times its weight (1 or 2). Weights and band thresholds are planning assumptions. Unanswered items count as no. Guidance only. This is not an audit, a certification or legal advice.

Talk to OceanLab about your first AI project

Opens an email to OceanLab with this result and a link to your inputs. Nothing is sent until you press send, and there is no sign-up.

Prefer a form? Use the contact page.
Method

How this is calculated

Each item scores no 0, partly 1 or yes 2, times its weight (1 or 2). Unanswered items count as no. The overall score is the weighted share of the maximum.

Bands: 75% and above is ready to pilot, 50% nearly ready, 25% build foundations first, below that early. The weights and band thresholds are OceanLab planning assumptions.

Open items are listed by weight, so the gaps that block a project most come first.

FAQ

Questions about this tool

What does the score mean?

It is the weighted share of items you answered yes, with partly counting half. The bands, from early to ready to pilot, are planning assumptions with advice for each.

Which gaps should I close first?

The results list open items by weight. High-weight items such as data access, a written process and a human fallback come first.

Is this an audit or certification?

No. It is guidance to plan with. For regulated uses, check the rules that apply, for example with the EU AI Act risk checker.

Is anything I enter sent anywhere?

No. The tool runs in your browser and there is no sign-up. Nothing leaves the page unless you choose to email your result to OceanLab.

Related tools

Other free tools

Product builds

OceanLab product builds like this

Products OceanLab designed and built. Each case study covers the screens, the scope and the rules it was built for.

AI agents & automation·🇳🇱Netherlands

Tallyman - Intelligent Document Processing for Trade and Customs Documents

Designed and built a clickable document processing platform for a Rotterdam freight forwarder and customs representative: it classifies commercial invoices, packing lists, bills of lading, air waybills and certificates of origin, extracts each field with a confidence score, checks it against business rules and sends only the uncertain fields to a person in a side-by-side review workspace.

AIEnterprise
AI agents & automation·🇦🇪UAE

Sanbuk - Accounts Payable Agent with an Operator Console and Approval Gates

Designed and built a clickable back-office agent for a Dubai mainland distributor: it reads the AP and vendor mailboxes, matches invoices to POs and goods receipts, checks UAE tax invoice fields, drafts replies and posts to the ERP, while people approve by amount, see every tool call and handle every bank detail change themselves.

AIEnterprise
Insurance·🇬🇧United Kingdom

Kittiwake - AI Claims Intake with a Person Behind Every Decision

Designed and built a clickable claims intake console for a UK motor and home insurer: AI reads the customer's story and photos, extracts the facts, drafts a damage estimate and suggests a triage route with its reasons, while a named person confirms cover, routes the claim and makes every call that could go against the customer.

InsurTechAIEnterprise
Customer support·🇱🇰Sri Lanka

Pahana - Trilingual AI Support Agent with Safe Human Handoff

Designed and built the staff console for a trilingual AI support agent at a Colombo telecom operator: a dashboard of containment and satisfaction, every conversation with its tool calls and guardrail events, a live monitor where team leads take over a chat, and a handoff queue that makes sure no customer passed to a person is lost.

AIEnterprise
START YOUR CONVERSATION

Your Next Mission-Critical
System Starts Here

Speak with a senior engineer about your requirements. No sales process, just a direct technical conversation about what you need to build.

OceanLab

Enterprise Software Engineering - Human + AI

Languages

Locations

Global Headquarters

21 Merchant Road, 3rd Floor, Singapore 058267

Main corporate office and leadership operations

North America Office

548 Market Street, PMB 12472, San Francisco, CA 94104

Client operations and business development

India Office

402 Shivalik Shilp II, SG Highway, Ahmedabad 380015

Engineering and delivery center

© 2026 - Copyright. All Rights reserved OceanLab