CLIENT: Morne Brise Bank Ltd🇲🇺Mauritius

Balans - Fair, Blind-Graded Skills Assessments for Bank Hiring

Pre-Employment Skills Testing for a Mauritian Bank

Designed and built a clickable skills assessment platform for a Port Louis commercial bank: campaigns tied to ATS requisitions, tests mapped to the competencies of each role, blind grading against calibrated rubrics with second marks, and scores that go back to the ATS as a suggested band while a recruiter makes every decision.

Scope of Work
Product design, UI build and clickable demo
Industry
Recruiting & Staffing / Skills Assessments
Enterprise
Compliance & Certifications
Data Protection Act 2017 (Mauritius)Equal Opportunities Act 2008 (Mauritius)Bank of Mauritius outsourcing and cyber guidelinesWCAG 2.2 AAITC Guidelines on Test UseStandards for Educational and Psychological Testing

Most of our work is under NDA. Per agreement, we can share the work but not the company details - all names and identifying information shown here have been changed.

Impact

5 Screens
Clickable end to end

Dashboard, campaigns, campaign detail with 4 tabs, grading queue with 5 tabs and the grading workspace for code and written answers, plus the New campaign sheet. All 15 demo campaigns and all 35 responses in the grading queue open their own page.

Blind
Grading by reference only

Graders see a response reference such as R-48120-2, never a name, accommodation or integrity flag. On a second mark the first grade stays hidden until the grader submits.

20%
Second-marked, plus near-cut

A 20% sample and every response within one rubric level of a cut get a second mark. A gap of more than one level on any criterion goes to the lead grader, and a lapsed calibration locks that rubric.

334 Sittings
Realistic demo data

15 campaigns across 6 role profiles, 6 assessments with 16 sections, 5 rubrics with level descriptors and anchors, 44 grading assignments and 19 staff users.

The Problem

Morne Brise hires about 550 people a year with three tools that did not talk to each other: a quiz tool whose 40 questions had circulated among students for four years, coding exercises emailed as zip files and marked without a shared rubric, and Word documents for the graduate case. A webcam monitoring trial was stopped by the data protection officer, accommodation requests went unanswered, nobody could tell whether any test disadvantaged a group, and rejected candidates got no feedback.

Our Solution

Balans runs each assessment campaign from an ATS requisition, only offers tests mapped to the role's competencies, and grades written and code answers blind against calibrated rubrics with second marks. It scores and suggests a band, sends results back to the ATS and leaves every progression or rejection to a recruiter.

The Challenge: Tests That Are Fair, Job-Relevant and Private

A bank hiring tellers, credit and AML analysts, engineers and graduates has to show that each test measures the job, that graders agree with each other, and that candidates' personal and sensitive data is handled under Mauritian law.

Graders Who Disagreed

Coding submissions were marked by whichever engineer had time, and two engineers scoring the same submission often disagreed by two grades out of five. Without rubrics, anchors or calibration, a score said as much about the grader as the candidate.

Proctoring Without Surveillance

The Data Protection Act 2017 asks for collection limited to what the test needs. Balans records only focus loss, paste size, IP changes and a second device, with no webcam, microphone, screen recording or attention scoring, and no flag changes a result without a person's decision.

Accommodations Kept Confidential

Impairment is a protected status under the Equal Opportunities Act 2008. Candidates can ask for 25%, 50% or 100% extra time, breaks or alternative formats, and only the accommodations coordinator sees the request. Graders and hiring managers never learn that one was made.

No Automated Rejection

The Act generally gives people a right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing. Balans auto-scores only against answer keys, test cases and query results, sends a suggested band to the ATS and has no auto-reject action anywhere.

Our Approach: From Job Analysis to a Clickable Assessment Platform

01

Spec and Rules Research

Mapped 12 user roles from recruiter and grader to fairness analyst, data protection officer and candidate, and 38 screens: 32 for staff and 6 for candidates. Defined the data model for role profiles, assessments, items and pools, sittings, rubrics, calibration, integrity cases and accommodations, and wrote down the rules the design follows: the Data Protection Act 2017, the Equal Opportunities Act 2008, Bank of Mauritius outsourcing expectations, WCAG 2.2 AA and good testing practice.

02

Clickable Demo on a Production UI Kit

Built 5 key screens on a production dashboard kit: the dashboard with KPIs, active campaigns, role-based My work and sittings per week; campaigns with status filters and completion; campaign detail with candidates, results histograms, setup and activity; the grading queue with calibration status; and the blind grading workspace with code, test results, diff against the starter code, case packs and rubric scoring. All actions run on local state.

03

What a Production Build Adds

Write-back to SAP SuccessFactors or Workday Recruiting, a self-hosted Judge0 sandbox and disposable PostgreSQL databases for code and SQL tasks, JPlag similarity checks, Microsoft Entra ID sign-on, email and SMS reminders, and ServiceNow for accommodation cases. The candidate test runner, item bank, calibration, integrity and adverse impact screens, the audit log, retention rules and Azure hosting with a recorded safeguard for each transfer.

Why It Works: A Person Decides, Every Test Earns Its Place

Only Mapped Tests Can Be Picked

When a recruiter sets up a campaign, only assessments linked to the requisition's role profile can be chosen; others show Not mapped to this role. The summary shows time per candidate, devices per section, competencies covered and estimated grader hours.

Cut Scores Are Guidance

Campaign results show score histograms per section with the cut marked, and the cut is labelled guidance, not a decision. Bands are suggestions sent to the ATS, where the recruiter progresses or rejects the candidate.

Grading That Holds Up

Each rubric row shows its level descriptors and a calibration anchor, every score needs an evidence note, and the running total shows its band. Graders work only on rubrics they are calibrated for, valid for 6 months, and disagreements go to the lead grader.

Adjusted Timing Without the Reason

The campaign candidate list shows a neutral Adjusted timing marker where an accommodation applies and never the reason. The grading workspace hides names, accommodations and integrity data entirely, so nothing but the answer shapes the grade.

Logo
Oceanlab

Enterprise Software Engineering - Human + AI

Languages

Locations

Global Headquarters

21 Merchant Road, 3rd Floor, Singapore 058267

Main corporate office and leadership operations

North America Office

548 Market Street, PMB 12345, San Francisco, CA 94104

Client operations and business development

India Office

402 Shivalik Shilp II, SG Highway, Ahmedabad 380015

Engineering and delivery center

© 2026 - Copyright. All Rights reserved Oceanlab